results have been excellent 'clean' images. I run my high iso images thru PR2 creating a DNG then input the DNG into C1. ![]() Although I really like Capture One, I don't have the best results with their noise reduction algorithm, hence my interest in PureRaw. I do a lot of event photography in low-light venues which requires high ISO (no flash permitted in most events). ![]() I purchased PureRaw2 and my initial impression is very positive. My understanding is that C1 doesn't yet support PR2 as a plugin, but perhaps they are working on it. Will be an intersting experience but I have a lot of gardening to do first -) I have yet to try PR2 as a plugin for CaptureOne. I bought PL5 but I think I'll wait next Black Friday and get PR2 at a discount, not upgrading to PL6 because I really prefer the Lightroom editing tools. Otherwise the result is a linear DNG that is editable just like the original raw file, but it's without a doubt better than the LR/CR demosaicing. ![]() I really would like DxO to stop interfering with my Lightroom catalog organisation. ![]() This means that after each process run, I now have to move each image to the correct folder manually, add it to a stack, and delete the newly created "DXO" folder I don't care about. As per the usual DxO spirit they think they should decide things for you, so, when used as a plugin in Lightroom, they create a new folder in your file structure and put the processed images in there, instead of simply saving them next to the original and create a stack. I downloaded PR2 trial, it looks like it gives the exact same result as PL5 with the "export-optical corrections only" option, but without the parameters you can adjust in the PL5 modules.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |